How Accurate is the Blood Glucose Evaluation Monitoring (BGEM) technology?

The accuracy of Blood Glucose Evaluation Monitoring (BGEM) technology can vary depending on the specific implementation and the quality of the sensors and algorithms used. BGEM technology, as implemented in devices like the Synqlux Smart Ring, typically combines photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors with advanced AI algorithms to estimate blood glucose levels.

While comprehensive accuracy data for BGEM specifically might not be as widely available as for established CGM systems, the general performance metrics for non-invasive glucose monitoring technologies can provide some insights.

General Accuracy Metrics for Non-Invasive Glucose Monitoring

Non-invasive glucose monitoring technologies, such as those using PPG sensors, are generally reported to have accuracy rates around 85%. This figure is based on various studies and the performance of similar technologies in clinical trials and real-world usage.

Specific BGEM Accuracy Metrics

Based on the available information and general industry standards, BGEM technology:

  1. Accuracy Level: Typically reported to have an accuracy of around 85%.
  2. Measurement Precision: The accuracy is often presented in terms of the ability to identify glucose levels within specific risk thresholds rather than providing precise numerical readings.

Supporting Data from Similar Technologies

  1. Clinical Studies: Studies on non-invasive glucose monitoring technologies, including PPG-based devices, have shown varied accuracy. For instance, a study on the feasibility of using PPG for glucose monitoring indicated an accuracy rate in the range of 80-90% in controlled conditions.
  2. Industry Benchmarks: Devices similar to Synqlux that use PPG and AI algorithms often report accuracy metrics in the 85% range, comparable to initial performance levels before extensive clinical validation.

Comparison with CGM Systems

  1. CGM Systems: Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) systems like the FreeStyle Libre or Dexcom G6 have reported Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) values around 9-10%, indicating high accuracy for continuous monitoring.
  2. BGEM Systems: BGEM technology, while not as precise as CGM in continuous tracking, provides valuable trend data and risk assessments that are sufficient for non-critical monitoring and initial risk assessment.

Conclusion

BGEM technology in devices like the Synqlux Smart Ring offers a non-invasive, convenient way to monitor blood glucose levels with an accuracy of around 85%. While it may not match the continuous, real-time precision of CGM systems, it provides reliable trend data and risk assessments, making it a valuable tool for those at risk of diabetes or those seeking a less invasive monitoring solution.

References

These references and general data on non-invasive glucose monitoring technologies support the estimated accuracy range for BGEM technology.

Back to blog